At this stage your aim is to identify priorities for the procurement that can later be incorporated into your RFx and evaluations. To do this you will need to define your sustainability goals for this procurement. These should be informed by, a review of your organisation's sustainability commitments, input from colleagues, and relevant risks.
To understand the procurement’s potential sustainability risks consider the full life cycle of the product or service. Then make a preliminary list of associated risks and opportunities to improve sustainability. This should draw upon any work already undertaken to EVALUATE RISK in your supply chain and consider previous contract data, where available. Make sure to also review your supply chain's legal risks and assess who has duties of care.
Be prepared to address concerns about conflicting goals, such as cost versus sustainability, by explaining to colleagues how sustainable procurement can add value. For instance, through innovation, efficiency, risk management, supplier relations, and customer loyalty. Life Cycle Costing and Return on Sustainable Investment (ROSI) tools can help to quantify this value.
EXAMPLE: Mining company discovers in-house waste stream that meets its need
A mining company regularly procures new mudflaps for their haul trucks. After considering alternative ways to meet this need, the company discovered that an in-house waste stream — worn-out conveyor belts — could be repurposed to produce mudflaps in a resource-efficient way.3
EXAMPLE: Sustainability prioritisation in Dutch Government procurement: the ambition web approach3
Using an 'ambition web', the Dutch government's central procurement prioritises sustainability, focusing mainly on reducing emissions, minimising raw materials, and mitigating chemical impacts. Secondary ambitions involve human rights and social costs. As a result, in ICT equipment tenders’ evaluation, nearly 87% of the quality score relates to sustainability.